How do you envision integrating Chat GPT's vision capabilities into your company's existing systems and processes for potential use cases such as customer service or chatbots, graph or image analysis, and what risks do you foresee?

Security & GRC
2.6k viewscircle icon2 Comments
Sort by:
Chief Information Security Officer in Healthcare and Biotech2 years ago

The biggest fear is data or code leak. 

CIO & SVP, Strategy & Innovation, Customer Engagement, and Retail Analytics in Retail2 years ago

We are excited about this technology and see real use cases across numerous industries. At this time it would be inappropriate to share the manner we will enable these capabilities.

Lightbulb on1

Content you might like

Have you observed evidence of cybersecurity candidates using GenAI/AI agents in their job applications or interviews?

Yes - I’ve seen clear evidence of this42%

Yes - I strongly suspect some candidates used AI42%

No11%

Unsure/other5%

View Results

Have you evaluated any “AI native” data security platforms so far (like Concentric AI, Normalyze, etc)? Interested to know your thoughts on these, whether or not you move forward with implementing.

As part of our NYSE IPO prep, we’re debating how to communicate our system hardening efforts in regulatory disclosures (e.g., SEC Form 20-F, SFC).

Would you recommend sharing % compliance (e.g., “85% CIS Tier 2”) or sticking to qualitative descriptions of how we identify and mitigate risks? Also, do SFC/ISO 27001 expectations require full ISMS integration, or is a % model acceptable?

Have you had API security breaches in the past year?

Yes68%

No31%

We’re preparing for an IPO on the NYSE as a Foreign Private Issuer and evaluating CIS Benchmarks to measure OS and database hardening.

Our proposed tiers:
• Tier 1 (70–80%) baseline
• Tier 2 (85–90%) for sensitive data
• Tier 3 (95–100%) for mission-critical systems

Is 80% compliance defensible for IPO due diligence with SEC or SFC? Should Tier 3 be considered mandatory for critical systems? And can compensating controls (e.g., PAM, microsegmentation) offset gaps in legacy environments?