How are other organizations structured to support HRIT systems? Looking to move from a decentralized model where HRIT sits in HR to a centralized within the larger tech org and want to learn from others on the latter.
CIO in Healthcare and Biotech, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
We actually went in the other direction. We were using ADP, and I had the system administrators working in my group. However, after a large change in systems, we moved the roles to report to HR. It made more sense, as the work they were doing daily directly impacted the HR teams. They are in their staff meetings and strategy conversations. They can support the organization more effectively as they are tied directly to that team. We still maintain a connection to them and help where needed. We partner to evaluate technical skills as necessary. However, I'm a proponent of the resources being on the teams they support where possible. VP of IT & CISPO in Finance (non-banking), 201 - 500 employees
We are still using a centralized model. We find it to be most efficient given our relatively small team.CIO / Managing Partner in Manufacturing, 2 - 10 employees
I would suggest a model where the admin and super user aspects are within HR, and the technology components managed within an IT Operations group. This allows you to provide proper support thru your service desk, and other IT Teams while sharing resources across applications.
Content you might like
Community User in Software, 11 - 50 employees
organized a virtual escape room via https://www.puzzlebreak.us/ - even though his team lost it was a fun subtitue for just a "virtual happy hour"
CTO in Software, 201 - 500 employees
Without a doubt - Technical Debt! It's a ball and chain that creates an ever increasing drag on any organization, stifles innovation, and prevents transformation.Yes, investigating it17%
Yes, selected and started deployment53%
Yes, actively using12%
Maybe not sure9%
No9%
339 PARTICIPANTS
Manager Total Rewards and Org Design in Finance (non-banking), 501 - 1,000 employees
We use servicenowTalent Retention33%
Talent Attraction47%
Upskilling talent to do more with less12%
Efficient Operations / Better Customer Service Delivery7%
Other – please specify0%
224 PARTICIPANTS