How well do you respond to LinkedIn cold Inmails? Is it something you act upon on? Or really don’t care?
CTO in Transportation, 11 - 50 employees
I mostly ignore.Chief Techical Officer in Software, 11 - 50 employees
99.99% ignore.CTO in Education, 51 - 200 employees
Generally blockDirector in Manufacturing, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
If they are linked to one of my LinkedIn contacts I am more likely to accept or read the informationGlobal Head of AI, Data & Analytics in Software, 10,001+ employees
The way I see it, LinkedIn is for professional networking not hocking your products99% of the time I'll ignore it
Real approach would be add me (with a note saying you want to connect because we work in similar fields)
Suggest a call or coffee
Chat about other stuff and build rapport
If I mention a problem your product solves, tell me
If someone just sends me their website or catalogue up front
Or if it's sent before we've caught up or talked about anything else, I dis-connect and might report spam (because it is)
If I can tell it's an automated InMail, I will report it as spam and block you
VP of IT in Media, 10,001+ employees
I ignore these as a policyContent you might like
Traditional on-premises management tools16%
Cloud management platforms (CMPs)76%
Best-of-breed cloud management tools40%
Tools available within public cloud platforms19%
91 PARTICIPANTS
Global Chief Cybersecurity Strategist & CISO in Healthcare and Biotech, Self-employed
There are a lot of intern positions posting and increasing.CTO in Software, 201 - 500 employees
Without a doubt - Technical Debt! It's a ball and chain that creates an ever increasing drag on any organization, stifles innovation, and prevents transformation.Easy to use unified view of data30%
Good data cleansing and transformation capabilities44%
Real-time or near real-time data integration55%
Above average automation capabilities37%
Works with all our applications and systems41%
Data governance support25%
Ability to scale and adapt to new data sources25%
Affordability of the solution17%
Potential for cost optimization11%
Other1%
193 PARTICIPANTS