Can anyone provide guidance on the following? We are looking for a provider in the area of "sanction list screening" for companies and persons, as a database or suitable for individual search.


1.6k views22 Upvotes8 Comments

Operations Manager in Software, 5,001 - 10,000 employees
Dun&Bradstreet is great. So is LexisNexis. You can do a demo with both and decide bases on your specific use case.
CIO in Energy and Utilities, 201 - 500 employees
By using Dow Jones Risk & Compliance, companies can access an updated and reliable database that includes information about sanctioned entities, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and associated risks. This helps mitigate the risks of engaging with entities involved in illicit or sanctioned activities.
Operations Manager in IT Services, 501 - 1,000 employees
Lusha
Operations Manager in Media, 51 - 200 employees
There are several providers that offer sanction list screening services for companies and individuals. Some popular providers in this area include Dow Jones Risk & Compliance, Refinitiv World-Check, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, and Bureau van Dijk. These providers offer comprehensive databases and tools for screening against global sanctions, watchlists, and politically exposed persons (PEPs). It is recommended to evaluate their offerings and select a provider that best fits your specific needs and compliance requirements.
1 1 Reply
Operations Manager, Self-employed

Thanks Shlvam for your detailed input.  

1
Operations Analyst in Manufacturing, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
There are several providers that offer sanctions list checks for businesses and individuals. Popular providers in this space include Dow Jones Risk & Compliance, Refinitiv World-Check, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Bureau van Dijk. These providers offer comprehensive databases and tools for checking global sanctions, watch lists, and politically endangered persons. 
Social Support Manager in Software, 11 - 50 employees
Apollo.io and adapt.io
Engineer, Self-employed
apollo.io

Content you might like

Yes - Maine did the right thing. There are too many security risks with free versions of these tools. Not enough copyright or privacy protections of data.30%

No, but.... - You must have good security and privacy policies in place for ChatGPT (and other GenAI apps). My organization has policies and meaningful ways to enforce those policies and procedures for staff.56%

No - Bans simply don't work. Even without policies, this action hurts innovation and sends the wrong message to staff and the world about our organization.9%

I'm not sure. This action by Maine makes me think. Let me get back to you in a few weeks (or months).3%


333 PARTICIPANTS

8.7k views9 Upvotes1 Comment

Open AI (Game Changer: adoption w/ChatGPT)40%

Google (Game Changer: inventor of Transformers, Bard)20%

Microsoft (Game Changer: real time BingGPT+Search plus enterprise enablement)18%

Meta (Game Changer: LLM that can run on single GPU)7%

Amazon (Game Changer: TBD)4%

X.AI / Elon Musk (Game Changer: TBD)3%

Baidu (Chinese tech giant, with GPT version released in March)3%

Someone completely new5%


792 PARTICIPANTS

26.9k views89 Upvotes14 Comments