I was reflecting about a recent article published by the BBC: "AI's solution to the 'cocktail party problem' used in court" (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yk5mdj9gxo) In my opinion is interesting because: It cover a field (also military...) of research where there are studies and papers around with wide adoption scenarios: isolating individual voices or specific footprint in noisy environments; That's a court, the importance in legal contexts, where audio evidence can be unclear and AI is used to elaborate evidences. There is a lot to discuss about but my tricky question is: AI processing becomes as reliable as human hearing, how eyewitness (or "earwitness") testimony is valued in court?

LeadershipApplications & Platforms

I believe we should trust to the AI13%

I believe evidences should remain untouched 53%

I trust and relying to the humans59%

I believe we should first define standard, globally if possible 38%

I believe we should find the right compromise in both9%

I have no ideas

32 PARTICIPANTS
164 viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon1 Comment
Sort by:
IT Manager in Constructiona year ago

Hello, thanks for joining in. 
Here you can find a recent and interesting study about “Cocktail Party Problem”: What Is It? How Can It Be Solved? And Why Should Animal Behaviorists Study It?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2692487/                                                                                                                                                        

Content you might like

Our digital transformation efforts are more designed to...

Use the latest tools to achieve current business goals76%

Redefine business goals based on digital opportunities23%

Can you walk us through your process for evaluating AI investments against core IT needs? What criteria do you use to determine when AI innovation is worth the potential trade-off?

Read More Comments

How do you think AI will disrupt business across industries? Add to my list: 1. Content creation 2. Photos and video production 3. Basic coding and debugging 4. Strategic analysis to be highly complimented 

Read More Comments

I work for a company with geographically dispersed operations, and we are facing significant challenges with our data collection and reporting processes for HSE (Health, Safety, and Environment). We collect a variety of environmental data (e.g., water quality indexes, equipment training compliance) from multiple sites. Our current data collection application has critical governance gaps. When an indicator shows a deviation, we struggle to trace its origin because the system lacks a clear audit trail. We cannot confidently verify who entered the data or when, which undermines the reliability of our HSE indicators. Furthermore, our data collection forms are rigid. Any request to add or modify fields requires our development team, leading to significant delays and hindering our ability to adapt to new requirements quickly. Questions: 1. How do you ensure robust data governance for HSE indicators? What tools or best practices have you found effective? 2. Have you successfully empowered your business or HSE teams to create and modify data collection forms without developer dependency? If so, what low-code/no-code platforms or solutions do you recommend?

If you currently work in the healthcare industry, how do you currently inventory medical, IoT, and IoMT devices?

Fully manual inventory17%

Automated software system with full visibility46%

Software system with limited visibility16%

Mix of automated/manual inventory15%

Other (please comment below)4%

View Results