point in time security assessments or security performance management that is more continuous / automated - which do you prefer ?  Check out this paper by Ed Amoroso - retired ATT Chief Security Officer - founder of TAG Cyber  https://www.tag-cyber.com/analysis/white-papers/requirements-for-security-performance-management

I plan to rely on static annual external assessments of security to judge effectiveness70%

I plan to look at security performance management capabilities to assess continuously my security effectiveness29%

254 PARTICIPANTS
1.1k viewscircle icon2 Upvotescircle icon1 Comment
Sort by:
Chief Evangelist in IT Services2 years ago

Unfortunately the link is broken

Lightbulb on1

Content you might like

Established AI governance framework with defined policies and oversight38%

Currently developing governance models and risk controls63%

Relying on existing security/compliance frameworks (no AI-specific policy)25%

No formal AI governance approach in place4%

View Results

IT18%

Data and analytics23%

Infosec9%

Privacy5%

GRC10%

Cross-functional working group/center of excellence34%

Something else (explain in a comment)1%

View Results