We currently have a 3-point performance rating scale (exceeds, meets, below expectations) however, our leaders provided feedback that they would like a 4-point scale that would allow a rating option that sits between meets and exceeds (i.e. a rating and description that describes performance that is more than meets but isn’t exceeds). What is your organization’s performance rating scale and what research did your organization use to determine this scale? Do you have any preferred consultants that you would recommend for advising rating scales to drive performance and engagement?

537 viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon3 Comments
Sort by:
HR Managera year ago

we have a 5 rating scale. Does not meets- needs improvement-meets-high meets-exceeds expectations.  

HR Manager in Manufacturinga year ago

Hello! Using odd Likert scales to avoid central tendency bias is always advisable. Precisely in this way, you force the respondents to position themselves about the question and not to adopt a neutral response that always puts them in a good light with the person being evaluated. Perhaps you could use a 5-point scale and introduce descriptions that let respondents feel more comfortable in their choices. 

1 Reply
no titlea year ago

 Sorry! I meant to say even scales.<br>

Content you might like

Assistive technology/tools 34%

Flexible work schedules 64%

Clear and accessible accommodations policies52%

Accommodation recognition training for managers22%

Ergonomic assessments 33%

Financial support for home modifications15%

We don't offer anything 15%

Something else (comment below)

View Results

Flexible work arrangements 61%

Social media engagement 28%

Upskilling and career development programs61%

Gamified recruitment processes7%

Mental health and wellness benefits46%

Sustainability and social responsibility initiatives32%

Personalized communication23%

Something else (comment below)3%

View Results