Looking to deploy a new LAN solution at my organization.  I don't want us to be tied to the whims of Cisco.  Are there actual, viable, healthy alternatives?

20.7k viewscircle icon2 Upvotescircle icon7 Comments
Sort by:
CIO GOVERNMENT OF JAMAICA in Software7 years ago

Personally, I would stick to Cisco notwithstanding the other alternatives. Their solution is tried and proven. 

Lightbulb on2
VP of IT in Software7 years ago

Where feasible, consider software-defined networking or software-defined data centre.

Lightbulb on1
CIO in Healthcare and Biotech7 years ago

We are on our second generation of HP/Aruba wired and wireless networking for a mid-sized organization and are very happy with the reliability. HP has been very aggressive on pricing and the product has been solid. Given pricing, CISCO is not even at the table.

Lightbulb on2
Sr. Director, IT Infrastructure in Telecommunication7 years ago

I've deployed Juniper at two separate orgs for Core, Aggregation & Access switching. Solid choice if you've got a bench or partner that knows Junos well. 

Lightbulb on1 circle icon1 Reply
no title7 years ago

I like Juniper products, too.  The problem is, I don't know Junos well and I am struggling to find a partner.

Lightbulb on1
VP of Global IT and Cybersecurity in Manufacturing7 years ago

Not sure if you are looking for campus or core, but for campus have a look at https://www.arista.com/en/

Lightbulb on2

Content you might like

Amazon19%

Google29%

IBM8%

Microsoft29%

Salesforce11%

Oracle2%

View Results

Cost structure26%

Lack of in-house skills to migrate / deploy / manage workloads on cloud47%

Security / governance compliance concerns20%

Lack of performance or features that you have on-prem but not the cloud5%

View Results