What is the most effective architectural design for rapid experimentation environment to support speed of prototyping potential AI projects before making scaling investment decisions and prioritization?

3.7k viewscircle icon2 Upvotescircle icon2 Comments
Sort by:
CIO2 years ago

For a rapid experimentation environment in GenAI, you will need to consider a modular and scalable architecture. For example, adopting a microservices approach to enable quick testing and iteration on specific AI components. Leveraging containerization (e.g., Docker, Kubernetes) for easy deployment and scaling. Utilizing serverless options for cost-efficient, event-driven processing. Implementing continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines for streamlined testing and deployment.

Additionally, ensuring robust version control and experiment tracking for easy rollback and analysis (this is key too as there will be multiple code iterations as you experiment with GenAI). Prioritizing a flexible data pipeline to accommodate various data sources. Using Data Lakehouse and other patterns for collecting and managing your distributed data. Lastly, integrating monitoring tools for real-time insights into experiment performance. Carefully adopted architectural approaches like these will allow swift prototyping, iterative testing, and informed scaling decisions.

Lightbulb on2
Practice Head, Cognitive AI in Banking2 years ago

If you mean the software or IT architecture, then there are many options. It depends on your use case and data. For example Server-less architecture helps you focus on ML algorithm and code rather than infrastructure. Data lake architecture helps you scale and handle huge volumes of data. Cloud based AI tools (manual and AutoML) will help you in minimising efforts on both ML algorithms, coding and infrastructure all together. Most organisations will have data in on premises and cloud systems, hence adopting hybrid method will be beneficial

Lightbulb on2

Content you might like

We don’t yet have a governance framework

We use manual checks or periodic reviews

We have defined policies and guidelines for the creation and deployment of agents, which each team ensures independently

We have introduced a platform to centrally manage policies, versions, and monitoring of agents

None of the above

View Results

Inevitable4%

Highly likely14%

Somewhat likely16%

Somewhat unlikely17%

Very unlikely41%

Impossible6%

View Results