Do you think that entry-level IT hires should receive training in foundational skills (like decision-making or problem-solving), or would you expect them to be proficient in those skills upon hire?
Sort by:
Entry-level is just that. Speaking from my own experience, I truly appreciated companies that invested in me, and helped me grow in my capacities, capabilities and skill-sets. It made me a better contributor and it contributed to my professional growth. A win-win scenario for both parties.
Depending on the organization, being only proficient in your "domain" doesn't bring the deepnest and value a team might be looking for.
Navigate in political decision-making, ability to communicate clearly or being able to summarize ideas are keys. Mentoring programs or tailored learning sessions are a must.
Entry Level IT hires are quite proficient in technology. However, there is a knowledge gap when it comes to funding IT projects, especially multi-departmental projects. They are usually not prepared or experienced in funding debates between departments. This is where mentoring needs to step-in.
When hiring, you expect all the skill sets to be commensurate with the position you are filling. With an entry level position, they should of course have a very solid foundation in place to build on, but being proficient usually comes coupled with experience. I would add that any subsequent training, over time, to supplement and reinforce those skills would be a benefit to the individual and to the organization.
They should receive training in that and other critical skills like diversity and equity along with help to learn how to present / participate in team meetings. I also find that many young people are not used to actually speaking on the phone. Text -- A++, Video -- A but the phone seems to baffle many.