ISSO and Director of the IRU in Healthcare and Biotech, 10,001+ employees
Office of the Chief Information OfficerCTO Northern Europe in Finance (non-banking), 10,001+ employees
Global Head of TechnologyDirector in Manufacturing, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
We probably changed the name every 3 to 4 yearsGlobal IT Services
Global Technology Services
Corporate IT Solutions
Solutions and Services
There were more but …. Just not memorable
The actual work being done never changed
Chief Information Officer in Manufacturing, 10,001+ employees
Currently, we have recently changed our name to Integrated Technology Services.Director in Manufacturing, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
Ah, add that one to my list too, we had that one in the past.... each Re-ORG and each new CIO always needs to rename the organization.
CIO in Software, 5,001 - 10,000 employees
Enterprise Technology.In the last company, we were IT Engineering (IT Eng)
Director in Manufacturing, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
another good one.
Head of Enterprise Applications in Software, 501 - 1,000 employees
Enterprise ApplicationsCIO in Government, Self-employed
Information and Communication Technologies - ICTContent you might like
A primary concern for all D&A initiatives12%
Something to mitigate, but not our primary concern73%
Not concerned. That is someone else's domain14%
Frustrated by the limitations it creates1%
I don’t know1%
113 PARTICIPANTS
CTO in Software, 201 - 500 employees
Without a doubt - Technical Debt! It's a ball and chain that creates an ever increasing drag on any organization, stifles innovation, and prevents transformation.Community User in Software, 11 - 50 employees
organized a virtual escape room via https://www.puzzlebreak.us/ - even though his team lost it was a fun subtitue for just a "virtual happy hour"
Director of IT, Self-employed
One thing I do is include them in the meetings about the changes that will take place and get their opinion. I also lay out the pros and cons of the changes and how it will effect us as a team moving forward.Yes, this is a good move for both the business and employees to recharge.32%
Yes, but vacation time could have been offered through a less disruptive model.49%
No, we can't afford to lose that many consecutive operating days.18%
Other (please share below)1%
916 PARTICIPANTS