When you’re creating an agile architecture, how can you tell when you’ve built just enough?
The architecture should address a need / goal regardless of how it is built.
This is a really great answer. I have to agree that not every component of the change needs to be established ahead of time, but I think it's all too easy for an organization to spin up a new project without considering what the end result should enable them to do, or whether they have those building blocks you mentioned. Change is all about shedding past roadblocks, gaining new capabilities, access to new or broader sources of revenue, or just better efficiency. As long as the team keeps those main objectives in sight, making decisions about how to navigate unanticipated hurdles becomes easier. It's a fine line between being too cavalier and suffering from "analysis paralysis".
I'm going to stop now before I tangent into timeliness of change.
Content you might like
Limited understanding of benefits18%
Organizational silos61%
Unclear communication53%
Employee skepticism55%
Resistance to existing workflows16%
Unclear roles20%
Job security concerns4%
Coaching and mentoring11%
Facilitating/scaling Agile46%
Removing impediments22%
Owning best practices11%
Leading Scrum meetings4%
Tracking progress2%
Sharing Agile knowledge across the org2%
I’m not sure2%
Something else not listed here0%