What is most important: speed, budget, quality?
Speed26%
Budget27%
Quality46%
Have to agree with Andrew here, it's a loaded question as all have importance in delivery. Problem is they are usually defined quite early on in a project and, as point in time estimates, can be influenced by factors unforeseen in planning.
They also influence each other (fast and cheap is not good, etc), so to pick one as most important is not going to lead to a good outcome.
They're also subjective measures that can vary depending on the viewpoint of the person measuring them. As Chris says above the CFO is going to have different priorities to the CIO.
My view is that these 3 measures are best used as indicators of progress rather than as critical success factors of a project.
Example - the rebuild of the Christchurch stadium (Lancaster Park - Wikipedia) ahead of the 2011 Rugby World Cup was on time, on budget, and quality was right where it needed to be. The project is still a failure because it never delivered the required outcomes.
If we're talking about my dinner:
If someone else is paying: quality.
If I'm paying: budget.
If I haven't eaten all day and I'm famished: speed.
Content you might like
Follow up to my previous travel question… What is your favorite place to travel to for work and why?
Poor efficiency of the detection and threat hunting solution (SIEM/SOAR, EDR solutions)49%
Too much time wasted on false positive alerts64%
Lack of security skills and defined processes46%
Not enough demand in the market6%
Adding MDR and other advanced security28%
Consolidating vendors48%
Expanding product breadth33%
Automating processes52%
Outsourcing strategies (ex: SOC or NOC)19%
Differentiating from competitors25%
Focusing on reputation building14%
Moving more to the cloud17%
Redefining MSP metrics3%
CFO - budget
Business - speed and quality
CIO - quality and budget
PMO - quality- and they do not get a vote
And it an economic downturn it will all depend on budget. Don’t make the budget get shutdown….