What is your approach towards “productivity outliers” (both high and low performers) when it comes to optimizing headcount?

2.8k viewscircle icon3 Upvotescircle icon2 Comments
Sort by:
CIO in Services (non-Government)a month ago

outliers do not represent your "normal" team's productivity. When you have high performers you need to spend some time understanding what makes them so efficient. most of the times is a skill or knowledge you dont have as part of your process, so you can't replicate it. Once you find the one or many differentiators you need to work with the high performers to embed that into the overall team process. share the knowledge, train your team.
on the other hand, a low performance has two sides: un-motivated or under-skilled. you need to identify what is the case. For under-skilled people, pair them with a mentor or a good performer to get them up to speed.
For a un-motivated employee, most of the times not even more money or recognition will make them excel. When people do the work because they are paid to do that and there is no passion or interest... hmmm... time to let them go.

CISOa month ago

Don't hire on forecast but instead on need and ARR.  Ensure conservative hiring practices for responsible scalability to avoid RIFs 

Content you might like

Business-side leader owns both data and analytics31%

IT-side leader owns both data and analytics58%

IT-side leader owns data while business-side leader owns analytics7%

None of these describe it2%

View Results

Return on Investment (ROI)44%

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)41%

Net Present Value (NPV)23%

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)11%

Payback Period22%

Business Process Improvements (e.g., increased efficiency, reduced cycle times, or enhanced productivity)44%

Customer Satisfaction and Retention30%

Competitive Advantage18%

Risk Mitigation27%

Ability to Foster Innovation and Agility14%

Employee Satisfaction19%

Something Else (share in a comment!)3%

View Results