What do you think about the new term "Organizational Midwives" promoted in Pia Lauritzen's S+B article? How will this influence the future of supply chain? https://www.strategy-business.com/blog/The-art-of-leading-in-the-AI-age
Sort by:
no title2 years ago
Agreed. I also have a preference for not using gender-specific language.<br><br>I had asked ChatGPT the same question earlier and received these suggestions:<br><br>Transformation Catalysts<br>Change Enablers<br>Digital Facilitators<br>Collaborative Guides<br>Transformation Coaches<br><br>
Interesting article, but I'm not excited about the term "Organizational Midwives."
I agree with many of the descriptions given, but the term leaves many unanswered questions. A midwife facilitates a safe and healthy delivery for the mother and the child, and brings expertise to the entire process. But who (or what) is the new 'child' for 'organizational midwives.'
The analogy does not work for me. How about: "Organizational Quarterback?"
Or better yet, I asked ChatGPT this question: What's a better name for technology leaders in the future than "Organizational Midwives" ? The answer is below.
ChatGPT
In the future, a more fitting name for technology leaders could be "Digital Transformation Champions" or "Tech Catalysts." These names emphasize the role of these leaders in driving technological progress, innovation, and change within organizations. Here are a few alternative suggestions:
Tech Pioneers
Digital Innovators
Technovation Enablers
Future Architects
Techno-Visionaries
Tech Strategists
Digital Disruptors
Innovation Evangelists
Technology Orchestrators
Digital Change Agents
These alternative names capture the essence of technology leadership and convey the proactive and transformative nature of their work. ...