For those that are not using the 9-box in Talent Reviews, what does your organization use instead?

3.4k viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon9 Comments
Sort by:
CHRO8 months ago

We go off of the following:  

New Hire/Performance Not Yet Rated
This rating applies to all new employees hired on or after September 1

Improvement Needed
Does not consistently meet expectations of the job

Meets Expectations
Fully successful. Performance consistently meets expectations of the job

Exceeds Expectations
Outstanding and consistently exceeds expectations of the job

Lightbulb on1
Director of HR in Healthcare and Biotech8 months ago

A prior org I worked for used a 3-box system, which inherently collapsed the 9 box into 3, such that each of the three boxes took performance and potential into account.

Lightbulb on1
Director of HR8 months ago

We use a 5 point potential for movement scale that we developed ourselves. 

VP of Talent and Workforce in Healthcare and Biotech8 months ago

25 box! (I know, wild!)

2 Replies
no title8 months ago

Please do elaborate...

no title8 months ago

what in the world!?!?

HR Manager9 months ago

Inspired by the shared approach from Gap - development 4 squares, we are also reviewing our model and trying to move away from the 9-box grid. Check this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7q-8CDwKOE

Content you might like

Yes62%

No37%

Other (please comment below)

View Results

1-4 weeks10%

5-8 weeks38%

9-12 weeks30%

13-16 weeks8%

17-20 weeks

More than 20 weeks11%

View Results