Published: 29 July 2024
Summary
SaaS management platforms empower organizations to address the challenges of unmanaged SaaS use, which leads to limited visibility, overspending, elevated risk and contract sprawl. This research is an initial assessment that helps infrastructure and operations leaders choose from suitable vendors.
Included in Full Research
Overview
Key Findings
Most organizations do not have a clear owner for SaaS management, with several departments involved in different aspects of the overall SaaS life cycle. The use cases in this research align with the teams most commonly involved with managing enterprise SaaS.
The fragmented SaaS management platform market complicates the selection process. SMPs that evolved from software asset or expense management offer depth in cost optimization, license entitlement optimization and application rationalization. Pureplay SMPs offer depth in operations and security-related capabilities, such as workflow automation, unapproved application identification, compliance and configuration management.
Vendors exhibiting strength in the critical capabilities and use
Clients can log in to view the entire
document.
- BetterCloud
- Calero
- CloudEagle
- FinQuery
- Flexera (Snow Software)
- Josys
- Lumos
- Oomnitza
- Productiv
- ServiceNow
- Torii
- Trelica
- USU
- Zluri
- Zylo
- Discovery
- Unapproved App Identification
- Expense Management
- Adoption
- Workflow Orchestration
- On/Offboarding Automation
- Configuration Management
- Compliance Analysis
- License Entitlement Optimization
- Application Rationalization
- Application Library
- Implementation and Managed Services
- Employee App Store/Service Catalog
- Extensibility and Integration
- Life Cycle Management
- IT Operations
- IT Asset Management
- IT Procurement
- IT Security and Compliance
Critical Capabilities Methodology