June 03, 2021
June 03, 2021
Contributor: Swetha Venkataramani
As more organizations explore returning to work after covid vaccinations are more widely distributed, executive leaders must consider how this presents significant risks to retention, performance and DEI.
As organizations decide when and how to return employees to physical workplaces, some still favor a “hard return” — a mandatory return to an on-site location for most of the work week. For many, health and safety has been the initial priority, but executive leaders must also consider the potential risks to retention, performance, and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
“Forcing employees back into nonflexible work arrangements could leave organizations vulnerable to talent being actively poached by employers that offer the kind of flexibility employees have come to expect during the pandemic. Employees have proved they can be productive when remote and are now challenging employers to articulate why they should return,” says Brian Kropp, Chief of HR Research, Gartner.
Download eBook: Reinvent Your EVP for a Postpandemic Workforce
More and more employees favor flexible work conditions. Over half of employees (55%) say that whether they can work flexibly will impact whether they stay at their organizations. Among employees who are currently working remotely or in a hybrid arrangement, 75% say their expectations for working flexibly have increased.
Today, more employees have work method flexibility than temporal and locational flexibility. For instance, around 71% of employees indicate that their job allows them to use personal initiative or judgment, but only 25% say that their role allows them to work from anywhere they want.
Download report: Adopt Long-Term Flexible Models
Gartner research shows that performance improves when employees are given flexibility over where, when and how much they work. Additionally, 76% of employees report that there has been an overall improvement in culture since the shift to remote work.
View resource center: The Future of Work Reinvented
Forcing employees to return fully on-site is also a risk to diversity, equity and inclusion because underrepresented groups of talent have seen vast improvements in how they work since being allowed more flexibility — and could be lost if flexibility isn’t an option.
Seventy-three percent of women who were fully on-site prior to the pandemic but have been remote since agree that their expectations for working flexibly have increased since the beginning of the pandemic.
Employees with a disability also report benefits: 56% of knowledge workers who have a disability say the extent to which their working environment helps them be productive has improved in the past 12 months.
View toolkit: Focus on advancing underrepresented talent groups
Executive leaders also have business considerations that will affect their return-to-on-site strategies. For example, do reopening plans account for changes in customer demand, and what do customers expect? How are competitors handling the returning-to-workplace process, and should they align or buck industry or competitor trends?
“In the long term, though, many organizations will gravitate toward hybrid work environments, moving away from location-centric ways of thinking and incorporating a human-centric design that provides the kind of radical flexibility that can fuel performance,” says Kropp.
In the short term, then, HR leaders will need to work with executive leaders on key actions:
Join your peer CHROs and senior HR executives from leading organizations to discuss specific HR challenges and learn top HR trends and priorities.
Recommended resources for Gartner clients*:
Talent Risks of a Post-COVID-19 Full Return On-Site
The Purpose of the Workplace When Work Happens Anywhere
Video: The Future Workforce Landscape: Impacts of 3 Major Talent Forces on the Future of Work
*Note that some documents may not be available to all Gartner clients.