Published: 02 September 2020
Summary
Field service management application priorities vary significantly by use case, so we compare vendors using nine capability areas weighted differently for each of three use cases. Application leaders can use this research and its companion Magic Quadrant as part of a broader evaluation process.
Included in Full Research
- Critical Capabilities Use-Case Graphics
- Vendors
- Accruent
- FieldAware
- FieldPower
- GEOCONCEPT Group
- GMS Development
- IFS
- Microsoft
- Oracle
- OverIT
- Praxedo
- Salesforce
- SAP
- ServiceMax
- ServicePower
- Context
- Product/Service Class Definition
- Critical Capabilities Definition
- Scalability, Industry, Integration
- Extensibility
- Connected Equipment Diagnostics
- Work Planning and Scheduling
- Technician Enablement
- Multiexperience Service Support
- Work Order Debrief
- Invoicing and Reporting
- Agreements, Operations, Contractors
- Use Cases
- Appointment-Centric: Volatility in Schedules
- Equipment-Centric: Complex Service and Support
- Outcome-Centric: Equipment as a Service
- Vendors Added and Dropped
- Critical Capabilities Weightings
- Critical Capabilities Rating