June 09, 2022
June 09, 2022
Contributor: Jordan Turner
Missteps put you at risk of encountering ethical and toxic workplace challenges.
While the concept of monitoring employee performance is not new, hybrid work has fostered greater interest in keeping tabs on workplace productivity. However, it poses ethical challenges and, when done incorrectly, creates a toxic work environment.
According to Gartner research, the number of large employers using tools to track their workers has doubled since the beginning of the pandemic to 60%, with this number expected to rise to 70% within the next three years.
Download now: How to Sustain Employee Engagement and Productivity
“Leaders and managers want to make sure their workers are being productive, regardless of where they’re located,” says Helen Poitevin, Distinguished VP Analyst at Gartner. “However, there is a widespread misconception that remote work leads to a decrease in employee productivity, despite data showing remote work leads to positive productivity outcomes.” In fact, Gartner research finds that 55% of employees are high performers when provided radical flexibility over where, when and with whom they work versus 36% of those working 9 to 5 in the office.
Still, leaders cite several reasons for implementing employee productivity monitoring technologies:
These technologies are built to collect data from various sources and generate insights, reports and recommendations. The biggest challenge is the concept of “productivity,” which is highly context-specific. Most often, these technologies detect time spent on tasks and how those tasks vary — this is not a clear indicator of an employee’s performance.
While there are risks, it is possible to effectively use the technology to help improve employee experience and productivity.
Although employee productivity monitoring continues to grow more popular, employee communications about the matter are lacking. A stunning 41% of employees report nobody in their organization communicates with them about what data is collected and why or how it’s being used. Plus, Gartner research shows even when there is communication on these topics, the quality of that communication tends to be poor, resulting in limited employee understanding and awareness of personal data usage.
To assist, clearly express to employees the different types of personal information you are collecting, when you are collecting it, why you’re collecting it and who has access to it. For example, most employees believe monitoring is done during business hours. However, some organizations collect employee activity data at other times.
There’s a clear benefit to transparency. Employees who are informed about why and how their organizations gather data about them exhibit higher discretionary effort and levels of trust relative to their peers who remain in the dark.
Organizational change management and communication are perhaps the most critical steps for successful rollout of this technology. Many employees are initially fearful when faced with the rollout and feel threatened that the technology will impact their reputation, choices, skills or relationships.
It’s important to note that rolling out employee productivity monitoring is not a low-risk project; all stakeholders must identify and align on a clear strategy. It’s crucial to strike a balance between the efficiency of broad communication and the personalized nature of individual communication. Compliance and privacy leaders can work with HR to:
Join your peer CHROs and senior HR executives from leading organizations to discuss specific HR challenges and learn top HR trends and priorities.
Recommended resources for Gartner clients*:
How to Derive Value From Employee Productivity Monitoring Technologies
Measure the Employee Productivity of a Remote Workforce
Myths and Realities of Employee Feedback
*Note that some documents may not be available to all Gartner clients.